Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus
Fall 2008
Course Projects

Course Projects & Criteria
Option
#1: individual self-paced design software training modules:
http://movielibrary.lynda.com/html/modlisting.asp?ref=vat
For this option, you will choose a design software such as
InDesign, Flash, or Photoshop from the Lynda.com training library and
either design a new project from scratch or redesign existing materials
you already have. These may be materials from your workplace,
professional, academic, or creative contexts. Note the $25
monthly fee, which is well worth it. No course calendar is provided for
this option; you'll create one as part of your project proposal, due
week 3.
Week #1: discuss possibilities
on class forum, narrow or expand project scope
Week #2: sign up at Lynda.com,
test-drive training modules
Week #3: present project
proposal
You will need regular access to the software -- at home, work, or a campus computer lab -- in order to make use of the tutorials and project files.
Option #2: Design your
individual professional portfolio
This is a good option for someone whose professional experience
and/or goals include multimedia, writing, editing, or other work that
requires a shareable showcase of your materials. No course calendar is
provided for this option; you'll create one as part of your project
proposal, due week 3.
Week #1: discuss
possibilities on class forum, narrow or expand scope (i.e., print or
digital materials, what to include/exclude, etc.)
Week #2: present
portfolio proposal, which includes preliminary reserach into career
trends in your field and representative job qualifications drawn from
ads.
Week #3: present initial
mock-ups
Option #3: team-basd
projects related to Technical Communication and communication
technologies.
Here are some initial ideas — jump
in with your own — we’ll form project teams of 3-4 people each based on
your interests:
Technical Communication & Communication Technologies
Focusing on the questions,
* What communication technologies have technical communicators used in
the past?
* What are they using now?
* What might they be using in the future?
Content Management, Blogs, and
Organizational Communication:
* A review of current practices, and what might the future hold via
report or blog.
Videogame culture & technical
communication
* Focusing on the timely question, how will videogame culture affect
technical and professional communication?
Technology in the Service of Human
Values
* A report or blog that shows howtechnology be used to support
life-affirming, community-based values and activities No background on
this one: we’ll have to invent it, and that’s a good thing.
* Develop a workshop or
training module on some aspect of Technical Communication and make it
publicly available on ASU’s iTunes
| Assignment |
Due |
Grade
Percentage |
| Acceptance Memo |
Week 1 |
5% |
| Course Survey |
Week 1 |
5% |
| Weekly Discussion Forum | Ongoing, as assigned |
15% |
| Project Reports / Logs |
Weekly, as assigned |
25% |
| Project |
Week 8 |
50% |
Grading and Evaluation Criteria
All of the writing and document design you do in this class is
evaluated with this criteria in mind:
- Your ability to articulate an intended effect, and the steps taken to achieve that effect
- Your attention to the rhetorical situation and your ability to adapt to multiple audiences
- Your effective and appropriate use of visuals
- Your ability to incorporate relevant and compelling research
- Your ability to edit and revise page (or screen) layout and design
A The writing & design is exceptional. This is the kind of text that might lead to promotions in the workplace. It is professional and reflects the designer's careful consideration of audience and purpose. It contains all necessary information, is written in an appropriate and engaging style, is memorable, and its delivery is visually appealing. It is free of mechanical errors.
B The text is strong. It would be considered acceptable in the professional contexts. It too reflects consideration of the rhetorical situation. It is generally above average in terms of the criteria mentioned above, but falls short of excellent in one or more category. It is free of mechanical errors.
C The text is competent. It would probably be returned for revision in professional contexts. It is generally average in terms of the major criteria listed above. It has few mechanical errors.
D The text is weak. It would probably get the designer into a bad situation in professional contexts. It falls below average in terms of one or more of the major criteria.
F Pink Slip
